[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes: >> I think we need to be more generic, handling any /\s*\/>/ -- >> the same problem occurs with other tags such as "<p/>", etc. >> A still-not-100%-but-closer version would be: >> >> $text =~ s@<([^>]*)\s*/>@<$1>@g; > > worth a try; I can't see any reason why not.
We have a list of valid tags, let's use it. At least make sure it's a tag. The above is bound to have lot of problems. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
