http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4788





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2006-02-10 19:36 -------
I think it is less clear when the "major new feature" is mostly an add-on. It is
"major" in terms of how useful it is, but not a major change to the existing
code. Since the purpose is to help mitigate the overly long wait between new
full versions, I am very happy to see users not have to wait for 3.2 in order to
get the benefits of it.

Perhaps we should make explicit the criteria for putting things in a full
(tenth) version release instead of a maintenance release. That would include
things like, perhaps, changing db structures, config file paths and formats,
outside module dependencies, etc., as well as changes that need more testing and
tester feedback than could be done in the timeframe of a point release.

But I think that sa-update is suitable for inclusion in a maintenance release.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

Reply via email to