Theo Van Dinter wrote:
I have no
evidence for this, but if full rules are helping cause problems such as
high memory use and large scan times (and it's certainly possible because
we all know how inefficient full rules are and have been -- that's why we
stopped using them in the first place), then shouldn't we try to help by
disabling the problematic rules by default?
No, I believe disabling the problematic rule type is too indirect an
approach. We should try to help by measuring scan times and disabling
those tests whose contribution to the scan times exceeds their value.
