http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4819
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-09 00:33 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > The patch masks (the only) warnings to an end user that might try to use the > same rule name twice. Something that should probably be a lint error, but > isn't. Yes, however, as far as I can see, we don't throw a lint error when reusing names for any other rule types either. for instance: mimeheader TEST Content-Type =~ /./ mimeheader TEST Content-Type =~ /./ causes: [11169] warn: Subroutine Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::MIMEHeader::_mimeheader_eval_TEST redefined at (eval 210) line 2. header TEST Content-Type =~ /./ header TEST Content-Type =~ /./ causes nothing. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
