http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4788
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-03-10 00:23 ------- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #29) > 2) I didn't think about it when the changes were being made to sa-update recently, but the new way of > doing things (use local_state_dir for all rules) instead of using sa-update for just updates to rules in > released versions means that people *have* to use sa-update for updates.sa.org if they want to use any > channels at all. I think this isn't terrible for 3.1, but we'll want to think more about this for 3.2. I'll > make another ticket to discuss it. OK, as long as nobody (SARE?) beats us to setting up an update channel for 3.1.1 I'm happy. Can somebody else please vote on the latest latest patch? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
