http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4854
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-03 19:21 -------
Using 3.2 as noted above,
I compared these two rules:
# Catch people with No RDNS on their relay IP's.
header FH_RELAY_NODNS X-HOST =~
/^\[\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\.\d{1,3}\]$/
describe FH_RELAY_NODNS We could not determine your Reverse DNS
score FH_RELAY_NODNS 1.194 #Prone to FPs.
#counts FH_RELAY_NODNS 12654s/100h of 41713 corpus (34082s/7631h
FVGT) 04/03/06
header FH_RELAY_NODNS2 X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted =~ /^[^\]]+rdns= helo=/
describe FH_RELAY_NODNS2 We could not determine your Reverse DNS
score FH_RELAY_NODNS2 1.194 #Prone to FPs.
#counts FH_RELAY_NODNS2 12654s/99h of 41713 corpus (34082s/7631h
FVGT) 04/03/06
The X-HOST header is added by MIMEDefang with a little customization I've done.
I'm using that to compare the results of my X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted rule and
with 3.2 it's working exactly as expected. Were any changes made to received.pm
since 3.1.1 was released?
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
