http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3109
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-12 11:09 ------- 'Therefore, any email to those people automatically goes to quarantine because the final score is 8.0. Without being able to shortcircuit and use the default score, you are always going to shortcircuit at the +100 (or whatever level you set).... which looses flexibility.' ok, that makes sense. However I'm still not fond of having two separate "parallel" ways to do the same thing; "shortcircuit default / score 100" and "shortcircuit spam" do the same thing two different ways. how's about getting rid of "shortcircuit ham"/"shortcircuit spam", and just have either "shortcircuit default" (renamed to "shortcircuit on") or "shortcircuit off" behaviour as the available options? Then the score alone is used to determine whether a rule shortcircuits as ham or as spam -- negative means ham, 0 or positive spam. if brevity of the configuration is the aim, we can still support "shortcircuit ham" / "shortcircuit spam", but just implement them in the config-reading subroutine as translating to "shortcircuit on / score -100" or "shortcircuit on / score 100". What do you think? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
