On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 05:22:19AM -0700, Loren Wilton wrote: > If it is a rule that requires new code to work, then the new code better in > some way come with the new rule. Otherwise there is no point in > distributing the (unworkable) rule, and no point in listing it in sa-update. > (And, contra-wise, if someone makes a wonderful new rule that just happens > to require code to work, the need fo code shouldn't disqualify it from > distribution.)
On the other hand, I maybe don't want to be installing new code that is run by root on an automated basis, but I'm fine with rules. -- Duncan Findlay
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
