http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4347
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|major |normal
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Status Whiteboard|vote/discuss (skip to |(skip to comment #21)
|comment #21) |
Version|3.0.2 |SVN Trunk (Latest Devel
| |Version)
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-14 20:54 -------
(In reply to comment #34)
> > After some more thought, I'm -1 on changing the behaviour of --lint
> > on a stable branch since it'd cause way too many people unnecessary
> > work/problems, so
>
> Well, I'm not sure I'd agree with the conclusion; I doubt anyone would
> notice,
> much less it would cause problems.
Nobody would notice? Anyone with their own meta rules that they publish across
all their systems that depend on plugins that may or may not be enabled would be
affected. When things stopped linting I'm sure they'd notice. My conclusion
wasn't based on speculation. I *know* that 3 of the 4 major ISPs in my area
would be affected by such a change. I really don't imagine that my friends are
*that much* weirder than anyone else's. It'd certainly affect a significant
amount of people, especially in the context of a maintenance branch.
> That said, I do agree that this probably shouldn't go in the stable branch.
> I'd be in favor of retargeting the original request at 3.2x after putting
> 3574
> into 3.1.
Yeah, retargeting at 3.2. I still think this'd be better off as a "strict lint"
that was discussed elsewhere before.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.1]$ svn ci -m "provide debug info about missing/disabled
meta
dependencies"
Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 422038.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] trunk]$ svn ci -m "provide debug info about missing/disabled
meta
dependencies"
Sending lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/PerMsgStatus.pm
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 422039.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
