http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4895
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-08-18 17:45 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > To clarify, "VOUCHED" should probably never have been used, as on its own it is probably one of the > *least* useful metrics. Hmmm, the above makes one wonder about the mechanisms that led to this rule being added to SpamAssassin in the first place. The proposed codes look like a really helpful addition to SA. Nonetheless, without serious financial (or other) incentives and penalties for companies (such as the Bonded Sender program), occasional non-compliance is to be expected, even if the non-compliance is only accidental. Thus, scores for these shouldn't be too high, perhaps no higher than the Bonded Sender rule. How do third-party mailing companies like exacttarget.com score under such a system? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
