Theo Van Dinter writes: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 10:31:10AM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > I wonder whether something like sa-update shouldn't be run after > > install to download all the rules after the core structure is installed. > > I mentioned some of this in my previous mail, but that was generally the > design we came up with at ACUS last year. sa-update was already written at > that point, but not yet being used. Through discussions, we decided to change > it such that all rules would be distributed through an update channel, hence > the major changes between 3.1.0 and 3.1.1. > > The discussion now seems to be down to three things: > > 1) what should a development checkout look like -- should there be > two separate areas which work independently? should there be a single > checkout which has it all? something in between? > > 2) what should a release distribution look like? similar to #1 but for > releases instead of development. > > 3) how should updates get generated?
I need to think about this idea -- unfortunately the wedding preparations are reaching fever pitch. I don't think I can get some think time until next week as a result... ;) --j.
