On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:51:58PM -0500, Michael Parker wrote:
> Not many but I will toss out an idea that I like to promote every now
> and then.  It sure would be nice if we could come up with some sort of
> syntax that we could define various received header layouts.  Then they
> could just be part of the ruleset and updated whenever a new one is found.

Hrm.  Basically rules for Received headers.  Have to think about that.  It's
doable, but I don't know if it'd be worth doing.  The performance is likely
going to be less than the current method, but more flexible.

And if we actually do keep up on our maintenance release schedules, I'm not
sure the trade off is worth it.

Hrm...

-- 
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and
 to the extent that we respect his opinion that his wife is beautiful
 and his children, smart."               - H.L. Mencken

Attachment: pgpJqnvMnuIAw.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to