http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5110
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-05 07:59 ------- Hrm. Interesting results: 22.807 25.2886 0.1464 0.994 1.00 1.00 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE2 26.188 29.0237 0.2928 0.990 0.67 1.00 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE3 19.882 22.0423 0.1464 0.993 0.00 0.85 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE In order: - content-type includes /\btype=/i - content-type starts with multipart/related - original So the diff between the original and #2 is probably that the original looks for " type=" and #2 will accept ";type=", so that's an easy win. I just threw in #3 because I was curious. Essentially what this means is that for my corpus, at least, multipart/related is very likely to be spam (and all of the #2 hits also hit #3). Interestingly, the difference between 2 and 3 are people ignoring RFC 2387. :( So part of me wants to just use #3. While the 2x ham rate looks daunting, it really means that instead of 2 ham hits, it was 4 ham hits. Thoughts? ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
