yep -- I screwed up the ruleqa.cgi script a while back.  oops ;)
should be fixed now...

--j.

Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
> Did this break?  This is the last one I've received.
> 
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: jm
> > Date: Wed Nov 22 00:49:47 2006
> > New Revision: 478090
> > 
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=478090
> > Log:
> > promotions validated
> > 
> > Modified:
> >     spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list
> > 
> > Modified: spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list
> > URL: 
> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list?view=diff&rev=478090&r1=478089&r2=478090
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list (original)
> > +++ spamassassin/trunk/rules/active.list Wed Nov 22 00:49:47 2006
> > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> >  # active ruleset list, automatically generated from 
> > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/
> > -# with results from: bb-doc bb-fredt bb-jm bb-zmi daf dos jm parkerm theo 
> > zmi
> > +# with results from: bb-doc bb-fredt bb-jm bb-zmi daf jm parkerm

Reply via email to