http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5224
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-11 03:51 ------- it compares pretty well to EXTRA_MPART_TYPE, actually. 0.00000 14.0934 0.0086 0.999 0.98 (n/a) __PART_STOCK_CID 0.00000 14.9132 0.0093 0.999 0.97 1.00 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 0.00000 16.1002 0.0482 0.997 0.91 0.00 T_OE_MULTIPART_RELATED 0.00000 3.6061 0.0171 0.995 0.89 0.01 T_TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG 0.00000 3.0567 0.0280 0.991 0.86 0.01 T_TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_MID 0.00000 16.4445 0.1034 0.994 0.85 0.85 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE 0.00000 0.5454 0.0000 1.000 0.80 1.00 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID2 0.00000 0.4746 0.0023 0.995 0.78 1.00 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID3_2 0.00000 0.4732 0.0023 0.995 0.78 1.00 TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID3 0.00000 19.3221 0.2512 0.987 0.75 0.00 T_EXTRA_MPART_TYPE2 0.00000 24.7442 0.3228 0.987 0.72 0.00 T_EXTRA_MPART_TYPE3 here's overlaps for T_OE_MULTIPART_RELATED -- http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20061208-r483886-n/T_OE_MULTIPART_RELATED/detail?s_defcorpus=on&s_zero=on&srcpath=rulesrc%2Fsandbox%2Fjm%2F20_basic#tOVERLAP_new overlap spam: 86% EXTRA_MPART_TYPE overlap spam: 85% __PART_STOCK_CID overlap spam: 85% PART_CID_STOCK overlap spam: 85% TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1 overlap spam: 73% T_EXTRA_MPART_TYPE2 overlap spam: 65% __MULTIPART_RELATED overlap spam: 65% T_EXTRA_MPART_TYPE3 so there's no 100% overlap there, either way. this link has overlap details for all of those rules: http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20061208-r483886-n&rule=%2F%28OE_MULTIPART_R ELATED%7CEXTRA_MPART%7CTVD_FW_GRAPHIC%7CPART_STOCK%29&srcpath=&s_detail=on&g=Change ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
