http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5291
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|3.2.0 |3.3.0
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-01-11 09:17 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> could a single, long-lived PerMsgStatus be created and kept around for these
checks?
>
> it's still yucky though...
Yeah, it's yucky. I was thinking that we could probably move some stuff into
the Bayes plugin (the eval rule portion is plugin-ized), and rearrange some of
the other functions so that this could all be cleaner, but in the end I think
that's going to be hackish as well, though less so than the current code.
So I'm moving this to 3.3 and we'll see about cleaning it up as part of bug
5293.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
