Justin Mason wrote:
Doc Schneider writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Just thinking -- why don't we just go for one? Is there a reason
we need to keep track of two sets of users? It strikes me
that we're just making more work (creating accounts every time)
where it could be simpler.
--j.
There you go thinking again! "Be afraid. be very very afraid" HAR!
We have two types of rsync users? One is nightly masscheckers and the
other is re-scoring masscheckers? Or am I way off here?
I've only got one rsync account and had asked you and you did say it
would work for the upcoming re-scoring.
yeah, I thought it did, but then Theo pointed me at something on the wiki
that makes me think otherwise now ;) So now I'm wondering why that is.
Anyway, there's no hurry -- between today, and results-submitting
deadline, there's about 2 weeks-ish.
--j.
What was it on the wiki which made you think one rsync account wouldn't
work? (If this is what your concern is) Send the url to it if you would,
please.
I read through the masses README's and it looked to me like one account
was all that was needed. But, of course, I could be mistaken.
Also any particular time for the start of the masschecks?
--
-Doc
SA/SARE/URIBL/SURBL -- Ninja
9:20am up 11 days, 18:18, 15 users, load average: 0.28, 0.60, 0.81
SARE HQ http://www.rulesemporium.com/
