Justin Mason wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
Justin Mason wrote:
Also, are you using the perceptron? don't ;) the GA produces better
results with current spam and rules, I've found. That would explain
the poor results on set0, I'd guess.
I'm using the GA. The ~52% hit rate is with the scores you generated
two months ago (with the GA). The ~94% hit rate is with the new rules
(and new scores) along with the old rules and scores.
wow, that's pretty bad... it might be worth investigating this to make
sure it's not biased data in the nightly logs. mind you, set 0 is
always pretty bad nowadays....
It could be the nightly logs. I'm actually ignoring logs from cthielen
as it looks like there's a lot of spam in his ham logs.
spam could have just changed that much too. DOS_STOCK_CDYV_GENERIC hits
on something like 4.1% of spam (27% of spam that would normally score
under 5). It got assigned a score of ~4 so that one rule alone could be
making quite a difference.
Daryl
