http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5673
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-10 05:50 ------- > In terms of "unfolding", I refer to removing both the newline and the > whitespace at the beginning of continuation lines. This is re-inventing RFC 2822, which says: ...wherever this standard allows for folding white space (not simply WSP characters), a CRLF may be inserted before any WSP. > it could also be something like this: > Received: from some-long-hostname-breaking-folding.jmason.org (localhost > [127.0.0.1]) by radish.jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id > 0409E33287 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:30:15 +0100 > (IST) It could also be: Received:\tfrom some-long-hostname-breaking-folding.jmason.org (localhost \t[127.0.0.1]) by\tradish.jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP\tid 0409E33287 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:30:15 +0100 (IST) > This regexp ... is easier for a rule developer to deal with > than the alternative ... > Again, this is by design, and IMO is still valuable behaviour. In that case, *all* whitespace substrings should be replaced with a single space, not just those after a CRLF. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
