On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 01:07:19AM +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: > As long as users set their expectations right and understand this > is not a replacement for a more dependable virus checking ...
Honestly I'm -0.5 on this. SA isn't a virus scanner, and while it could
definitely be used in such a way, I don't want people to get confused. I
also, frankly, don't want to be responsible for supporting the plugin since
it's not really core to what we do. Also, there are other, likely better,
ways of doing virus scanning than using the plugin -- people using amavis or
mailscanner are probably far outnumbering those who use the plugin, for
example.
That said, I haven't looked at the plugin nor do I do virus scanning on my
mail, so I could totally be biased in some of my opinions.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"it's so easy! you click, you kill, you loot!"
- Gonzo Granzeau paraphasing a friend about Diablo II
pgpbxUbt5hKS0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
