http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5686
------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-10-19 07:09 ------- here's that Bayes chain rule, with K3=8: SCORE NUMHIT DETAIL OVERALL HISTOGRAM (. = ham, # = spam) 0.000 (100.000%) ..........|....................................................... 0.000 ( 1.709%) ##########|# 0.040 ( 0.055%) # | 0.120 ( 0.055%) # | 0.920 ( 0.055%) # | 0.960 (98.126%) ##########|####################################################### Threshold optimization for hamcutoff=0.30, spamcutoff=0.70: cost=$33.00 Total ham:spam: 1976:1814 FP: 0 0.000% FN: 33 1.819% Unsure: 0 0.000% (ham: 0 0.000% spam: 0 0.000%) TCRs: l=1 54.970 l=5 54.970 l=9 54.970 SUMMARY: 0.30/0.70 fp 0 fn 33 uh 0 us 0 c 33.00 so that doesn't really improve it much. I think the method used in comment 2 seems to be performing the best here so far; that's the use of OSBF with traditional naive Bayes combining (at least, the trad combiner we used to use in SA before we switched to Fisher/Robinson chi square combining). ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
