Sidney Markowitz wrote, On 4/1/08 9:33 AM: > -1 on release if you see this vote in time. [...] > I can easily be convinced otherwise if someone tells me that it produces > warnings only > without breakage (because it is in an eval which will default the resolution > to 1 which > isn't so bad a result?)
Based on Mark's comment #5 in bug 5762 saying that this is exactly what happens and only on three year old version of Time::HiRes, I withdraw my -1. However, I am still +1 on getting this fix into 3.2.4 if that is still possible. -- sidney
