Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes: > On 25/03/2008 4:18 PM, Justin Mason wrote: > > Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes: > >> Might be a problem if *all* of the messages are inaccessible. I don't > >> think I have ever tested that scenario. > > > > hmm. a good deal of messages should be fine! I guess the date limits > > could exclude them, though--- maybe... > > OK, it has got 14k+ messages, so that's OK. I do think it's a bug being > triggered by messages that become inaccessible or exceed the retry count > though. A quick look doesn't yield anything obvious that I missed in > the code (which was shoe-horned into the existing logic), so I'll try to > make some time to look at it more later today.
thanks Daryl! > On a possibly related note (it might be why we're seeing the bug being > triggered but not the cause of the bug), there are a small bunch of > these that look un-good: > > plugin: eval failed: panic: unknown regstclass 0 at > /home/jm/nightlymc_jm/code/masses/../rules/70_sandbox.cf, rule > T_FU_LONG_HTML, line 1. I (foolishly) installed perl 5.10 on the 2 slaves. looks like it's found a bug ;) --j.
