Warren Togami writes:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > Quanah Gibson-Mount writes:
> >> --On Friday, March 14, 2008 3:36 PM +0000 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> ok, what bugs really need to be fixed for 3.3.0? feel free to set
> >>> Priority on bugs on the 3.3.0 milestone. in my opinion this is the
> >>> only real blocker:
> >> <http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4416> please please
> >> please. :)
> >
> > unfortunately, there's no patch there, and it appears that BerkeleyDB
> > doesn't support upgrading of .db files anyway. unlikely to get in,
> > given that!
>
> How are the 3.3.0 plans coming along?
Hmm. things have been pretty quiet -- I think we're all a bit distracted
by other, non-SpamAssassin-related stuff, unfortunately.
I've been meaning to try to push it along, the big work items are:
- fixing the distribution process to work without rules in the dist
tarball (since we'll be moving to a model where with distribute
without rules and they're downloaded by the admin on install).
- generating automated daily scores with Daryl. this is kind of complex
since it relies on having good rule-QA data coming in with the
"reuse=yes" flag set, and I'm not sure what our current status is
there.
I don't see anything else remaining in the 3.3.0 queue that are necessary
as much as those two.
--j.
