https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5928
Summary: MISSING_HEADERS should be MISSING_RECIPIENTS?
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.2.4
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi there
A bit pedantic, but I did find myself wandering around the SA source code
trying to figure out where the "Missing To: header" description came from.
Anyway, to me MISSING_HEADERS implies some form of meta rule - when in fact it
only covers missing recipient headers. Shouldn't it be replaced with
MISSING_RECIPIENTS, and then perhaps MISSING_HEADERS could become a meta rule
covering the likes of
MISSING_RECIPIENTS,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_SUBJECT, etc? Also, it's more
consistent with such rules too.
Jason
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
