https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5984
--- Comment #4 from Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-25 09:11:15 PST
---
I got tired of waiting for the weekly --net mass-check, so did a quick one of
my September mail.
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL is looking "deep" into the Received: headers; it didn't do
great. T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT, by contrast, looks just at the most external
relay. It's looking very reliable, hitting 53% of spam with just 2 FPs!
Better -- those 2 FPs -- I took a look, and actually it turns out both are
misfiled spams. ;)
OVERALL SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME
0 246621 8760 0.966 0.00 0.00 (all messages)
0.00000 96.5698 3.4302 0.966 0.00 0.00 (all messages as %)
34.970 36.2127 0.0000 1.000 1.00 1.61 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
overlap spam: 100% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS; 60%
of __RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
overlap spam: 97% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 39% of
__RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
overlap spam: 96% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL; 45% of
RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
overlap spam: 51% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL; 33% of
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
overlap spam: 51% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT;
35% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
overlap spam: 51% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL; 33% of
__RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
overlap spam: 24% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL; 32% of
RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
overlap spam: 24% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit
__DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL; 30% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
26.920 27.8764 0.0000 1.000 0.96 2.90 RCVD_IN_XBL
overlap spam: 100% of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL;
94% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL
overlap spam: 100% of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 31% of
__RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL
overlap spam: 79% of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL; 39% of
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL
overlap spam: 79% of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT; 41%
of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL
overlap spam: 79% of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL; 39% of
__RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL
overlap spam: 71% of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL; 25% of
RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL
overlap spam: 62% of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS; 28% of
__RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL
overlap spam: 36% of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET; 80%
of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL
overlap spam: 32% of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL; 24% of
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL
overlap spam: 29% of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB; 37% of
RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL
51.400 53.2254 0.0228 1.000 0.96 0.01 T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap spam: 100% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL;
95% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap spam: 100% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL;
95% of __RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap spam: 90% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN;
54% of __RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap spam: 77% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL; 53%
of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap spam: 60% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS;
53% of __RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap spam: 41% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL; 79%
of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap spam: 41% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit
__DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL; 75% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap spam: 35% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL;
51% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap spam: 24% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB;
59% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap spam: 21% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET; 89% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap ham: 100% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL;
2% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
overlap ham: 100% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL;
2% of __RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
74.688 77.3365 0.1370 0.998 0.87 0.51 RCVD_IN_PBL
overlap spam: 100% of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 87% of
__RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL
overlap spam: 63% of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS; 82% of
__RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL
overlap spam: 53% of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL; 73% of
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL
overlap spam: 53% of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT; 77%
of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL
overlap spam: 53% of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL; 73% of
__RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL
overlap spam: 45% of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL; 96% of
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL
overlap spam: 25% of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL; 71% of
RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL
overlap spam: 25% of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL;
67% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL
overlap ham: 100% of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 1% of
__RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL
1.437 1.4881 0.0000 1.000 0.85 1.69 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
overlap spam: 100% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY hits also hit __RCVD_IN_NJABL; 92%
of __RCVD_IN_NJABL hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
overlap spam: 96% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 1%
of __RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
overlap spam: 89% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL; 1% of
RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
overlap spam: 78% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS; 1%
of __RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
overlap spam: 64% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL;
2% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
overlap spam: 56% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL; 1%
of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
overlap spam: 56% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL; 1%
of __RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
overlap spam: 52% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY hits also hit
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT; 1% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit
RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
overlap spam: 30% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY hits also hit
__DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL; 1% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit
RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
overlap spam: 27% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL; 1% of
RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY
0.208 0.0000 6.0502 0.000 0.77 -8.00 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI
overlap ham: 100% of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI hits also hit __RCVD_IN_DNSWL; 11% of
__RCVD_IN_DNSWL hits also hit RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI
21.456 22.2151 0.0799 0.996 0.76 1.12 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap spam: 100% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS; 37%
of __RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap spam: 83% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 20% of
__RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap spam: 64% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL; 18% of
RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap spam: 60% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL; 24% of
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap spam: 60% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL; 24% of
__RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap spam: 59% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT;
24% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap spam: 38% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit
__DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL; 28% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit
RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap spam: 37% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL; 29% of
RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap spam: 20% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET;
37% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap ham: 100% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit __RCVD_IN_DNSWL; 0%
of __RCVD_IN_DNSWL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap ham: 100% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS; 1%
of __RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap ham: 85% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 0% of
__RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap ham: 57% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL; 5% of
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap ham: 57% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL; 5% of
__RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap ham: 42% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET;
16% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap ham: 42% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit
__DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL; 8% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit
RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
overlap ham: 28% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED; 0%
of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB
0.110 0.1143 0.0000 1.000 0.73 2.81 RCVD_IN_SBL
overlap spam: 100% of RCVD_IN_SBL hits also hit __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL;
0% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SBL
overlap spam: 100% of RCVD_IN_SBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 0% of
__RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_SBL
overlap spam: 73% of RCVD_IN_SBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL; 0% of
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SBL
overlap spam: 73% of RCVD_IN_SBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL; 0% of
__RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SBL
overlap spam: 58% of RCVD_IN_SBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT; 0%
of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit RCVD_IN_SBL
0.109 0.0000 3.1735 0.000 0.69 -4.30 RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED
overlap ham: 97% of RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED hits also hit RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED;
16% of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED hits also hit RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED
overlap ham: 97% of RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED hits also hit __RCVD_IN_DNSWL; 6%
of __RCVD_IN_DNSWL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED
0.018 0.0182 0.0000 1.000 0.58 1.84 RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY
overlap spam: 100% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY hits also hit __RCVD_IN_NJABL; 1%
of __RCVD_IN_NJABL hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY
overlap spam: 77% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL; 0%
of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY
overlap spam: 77% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL; 0%
of __RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY
overlap spam: 66% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 0%
of __RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY
overlap spam: 60% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY hits also hit
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT; 0% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit
RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY
overlap spam: 26% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS; 0%
of __RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY
overlap spam: 22% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY hits also hit
__DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL; 0% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit
RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY
overlap spam: 20% of RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY hits also hit
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET; 0% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit
RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY
12.100 12.5229 0.2055 0.984 0.56 2.19 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap spam: 95% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN;
13% of __RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap spam: 93% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL;
20% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap spam: 93% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL;
20% of __RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap spam: 89% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit
T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT; 21% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap spam: 84% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit
__DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL; 35% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap spam: 80% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL; 36%
of RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap spam: 61% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS;
12% of __RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap spam: 46% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL; 7%
of RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap spam: 37% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB;
20% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap spam: 23% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL;
8% of RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap ham: 100% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit
__DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL; 50% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap ham: 100% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN;
2% of __RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap ham: 88% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL;
23% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap ham: 88% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL;
23% of __RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap ham: 50% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit __RCVD_IN_DNSWL;
0% of __RCVD_IN_DNSWL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
overlap ham: 33% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED;
0% of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET
0.012 0.0000 0.3425 0.000 0.54 -0.10 RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER
overlap ham: 100% of RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER hits also hit __RCVD_IN_DNSWL; 0%
of __RCVD_IN_DNSWL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER
overlap ham: 63% of RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER hits also hit RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED; 1%
of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED hits also hit RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER
overlap ham: 60% of RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER hits also hit RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED;
6% of RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED hits also hit RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER
overlap ham: 36% of RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER hits also hit RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW; 5%
of RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW hits also hit RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER
54.038 55.9291 0.7877 0.986 0.51 0.01 T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap spam: 100% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL; 100% of
__RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap spam: 95% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT;
100% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap spam: 90% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 57% of
__RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap spam: 73% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_PBL; 53% of
RCVD_IN_PBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap spam: 59% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS; 55% of
__RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap spam: 41% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL;
79% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap spam: 39% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_XBL; 79% of
RCVD_IN_XBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap spam: 33% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL; 51% of
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap spam: 24% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB; 60% of
RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap spam: 20% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET;
93% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap ham: 100% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_BRBL; 100% of
__RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap ham: 79% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_ZEN; 6% of
__RCVD_IN_ZEN hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap ham: 60% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_DNSWL; 0% of
__RCVD_IN_DNSWL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap ham: 33% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit __RCVD_IN_SORBS; 5% of
__RCVD_IN_SORBS hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap ham: 30% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL;
58% of __DS_DEEP_RCVD_IN_SBLXBL hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
overlap ham: 23% of T_RCVD_IN_BRBL hits also hit RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET;
88% of RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET hits also hit T_RCVD_IN_BRBL
very nice indeed. good to see it doesn't overlap too much with the other BLs.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
