On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:41, Mark Martinec <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is there any need for me to bother with SVN, at least initially? >> It seems to me that working against 3.2.5 should be adequate, >> but I don't pretend to know for certain. > > 3.2.5 should be alright for the purpose, although generally new development > would be least painful when starting from current code. As it stands > presently, the CVS head is stable and is still compatible with 3.2.5, > so one can switch back and forth if necessary. One of the shifts in 3.3 > is tighter error handling and informative reporting/logging of all > unexpected/unhandled error conditions, please keep it in mind.
and, of course, if you want the plugin to get into released versions of SA, it'll _need_ to be made against trunk for that to happen ;) --j.
