yep.
"Kevin A. McGrail" writes: >This definitely sounds like the right track. Thanks. > >Basically, I'm checking the name of the box that relayed using the received >header. > >So if the user confirms/changes trusted_networks and internal_networks >settings to reflect their network and then I change the rule to check >X-Spam-Relays-Untrusted instead of Received, we would essentially bypass >their internal/trusted network relays for the test. > >Correct? > >Regards, >KAM > > > >> I think you can do this with the X-Spam-Relays-* headers. would that work? >> >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 20:15, Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I've been looking at some rules and discussing a FP with a user that >>> would >>> benefit greatly from ignoring the most recent received header. Is there >>> currently a way to do this or would a new ruletype be the best way to >>> achieve this? >
