On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 14:32 +0100, Justin Mason wrote: > link? these look ok: > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090331-r760369-n/RCVD_IN_PBL/detail#all > > although there are only two submitters at the moment, myself and zmi. > everyone else seems to have given up.
Hmm, I phrased that badly. Yes, technically it looks fine. Though what I saw yesterday was even less than that, only a single corpus wherever I checked. Like this... http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20090325-r758178-n About 1k spam. That I meant by essentially empty. I do recall *mass* check results 3 orders of magnitude higher. > 2009/3/31 Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]>: > > Guys, > > > > what happened to the nightly mass-checks? With the exception of the > > weekly network mass-checks, they are essentially empty. :-/ FWIW, I actually pondered to contribute to the mass-checks, too, eventually. Currently blocked by a couple other stuff, including hardware that can handle it. -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4"; main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
