https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6114
--- Comment #3 from Adam Katz <[email protected]> 2009-05-15 22:17:26 PST --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #0) > > 70_sc_top200's main merit was [...] > > Now that rings some bells. :) Old rule-set, outdated, deprecated, not > updated, > blah blah blah. All buried somewhere in last months list archives, or > something. The OpenProtect sa-update channel syndicates a number of dangerously outdated SARE channels, specifically 70_sc_top200. Lots of people still use it (and the stale SARE channels) without realizing this issue. Big problem. > > SpamCop also publishes the top /8 and /24 CIDR networks by several metrics, > > including spam volume. I've created some rules that examine the top > > offending > > networks at those two levels plus the top offending individual servers (/32 > > CIDRs) at several thresholds. > > They do? Nice. I do recall having some brief look, though didn't find that. > Any pointers, where that is? /8: http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=map;net=0;sort=spamcnt /24: http://spamcop.net/w3m?action=map;net=cmaxcnt;mask=65535;sort=spamcnt /32: http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=hoshame The first two have tsv links at the bottom. I scrape the third with "links -dump $url" -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
