ok! Here's what I see in bugzilla right now: ID Sev Pri OS Assignee Status Resolution Summary 6077 maj P1 All [email protected] NEW fix failing tests 6131 maj P1 All [email protected] NEW Makefile.PL is doing evil things to detect DESTDIR 6139 maj P1 All [email protected] NEW remove "rulesrc" external from SVN tree 5553 nor P1 All [email protected] ASSI MIME_BASE64_TEXT does not handle charset properly 5871 enh P1 All [email protected] REOP need docs for new '--filter-retries' spamc switch
[so those are the 5 P1s. these are all things that should be done before a release, but none of them are blockers IMO.] 4949 nor P2 Free [email protected] NEW spamd shutting down when unable to fork new processes 5591 nor P2 Sola [email protected] NEW make test fails at spamd_hup test on Solaris 9, 10 6132 enh P2 All [email protected] REOP FreeMail plugin [would be nice to get done but again not blockers.] everything else on the 3.3.0 milestone can be pushed off if nobody gets the tuits to do them. I think we could conceivably start the 3.3.0 release process soon.... paging Warren ;) How's about I cut an alpha at the end of this week? --j. On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 23:00, Justin Mason<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 21:37, Justin Mason<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 21:21, Theo Van Dinter<[email protected]> wrote: >>> fwiw, the process used to be: >>> - beta releases to get things stabilized >>> - use a beta release to do mass-check runs >>> - generate scores with mass-check data and submit to svn >> >> I think we may be able to simplify that, now that Daryl's system is >> generating scores weekly... >> >> Also one hard part that we need to do is finish the "no rules in main >> tarball" work item. > > which I've just done ;) > > is there anything else that we should sort out before an alpha is viable? > > --j. > >>> - rc releases to get wider testing w/ scores >>> - release after rc appear to work
