On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 22:40, Warren Togami<[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/06/2009 05:32 PM, Justin Mason wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 21:05, Warren Togami<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 07/06/2009 04:00 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: >>>> >>>> Warren, >>>> >>>>> On 07/03/2009 10:37 PM, Matt Kettler wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The public alpha release was announced yesterday on the users mailing >>>>>> list: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/spamassassin-users/200907.mbox/% >>>>>> [email protected]%3e >>>>> >>>>> I'm having trouble getting it to run on Fedora 11. >>>>> >>>>> [r...@newcaprica spamassassin]# >>>>> sa-update config: no configuration text or files found! >>>>> do you need to run 'sa-update'? >>>>> check: no loaded plugin implements 'check_main': cannot scan! >>>>> Check the necessary '.pre' files are in the config directory. >>>> >>>> Yes, and? Did you run sa-update??? >>>> >>>> The 3.3 no longer comes with rules in the same package. >>>> These must be installed separately with 'sa-update', >>>> which either fetches them from the net, or can install >>>> them from a tar - which is in the same directory >>>> as 3.3.0-alpha1 is. >>>> >>>> Mark >>> >>> sa-update is failing due to the lack of the /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.pre >>> files. >>> >> >> this sounds like our RPM spec file is buggy -- does it work if >> installed from the tgz? >> >> --j. > > This isn't the upstream RPM spec file. This is Fedora's spec file. > > How can it copy the *.pre files into the RPM if the *.pre files do not exist > in the tarball's rules/ directory?
crap, you're right. :( https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6147 there's a patch there that appears to fix it. does it work for you? --j.
