https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6143
--- Comment #21 from Sidney Markowitz <[email protected]> 2009-07-07 02:39:09 PST --- (in reply to comment #20) gcc -Wall does warn about the uninitialized variable, which was part of how I tracked it down. As for the -O, it's to be expected that an uninitialized pointer variable would produce different unpredictable results with different code generating options, and I guess this one just happened to work out this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
