https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4892
--- Comment #21 from Cedric Knight <[email protected]> 2009-08-07 01:14:56 PST --- Created an attachment (id=4505) --> (https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4505) Another FUZZY_XPILL false positive, bulk non-spam, somewhat munged But how many of the spam hits for FUZZY_XPILL are actually for the right reason? One third of the hits I see are on ham (I'd reduced score to 1.2 for this reason), and the rest are on spam in Cyrillic that is about Moscow removals firms, tyre rebalancing etc. with no pharmaceutical connotations. I don't have samples but it looks like there would be a high rate of FPs on Cyrillic ham, as well as the ones already discussed. Here's another false positive (English, bulk, ham, anonymised). The modified rule still hits all fuzzy references to the drug name I can devise, although could use (?:_|\b) instead of \b. I guess this rule will get zeroed by the score generation, but it would be good to see the fix in update channels etc. Could it please be reprioritised? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
