> I just got a 419/fillform spam where the bulk of the message was in a
> base64-encoded plain text attachment. This effectively bypassed the many
> BODY and RAWBODY tests that would have hit on the text had it been
> included in the message body.
>
> Should plain text attachments be scanned as regular message parts?
Sample?
As I understand the docs, both are supposed to include all text parts.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
