https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6184
Summary: FN header exists eval rule fails if header is 0 (ZERO)
so does regex
Product: Spamassassin
Version: 3.2.5
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: Rules (Eval Tests)
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]
using sa debug, on this rule:
header __ST_ISMMS exists:X-MMS-Message-Type
will also FN on THIS rule:
header __ST_ISMMS X-MMS-Message-Type =~ /./
and FN on this rule:
header __ST_ISMMS X-MMS-Message-Type =~ /0/
(why does a 'zero' not be /./?)
a 1 is fine there, but not a zero? does the header eval rules stip out a
literal zero?
can see subrule hit in debug mode if header contains: (see subtests
X-Mms-Message-Type: 1
./sa-test.pl /tmp/RSbM-3pdTzIE.eml
__CT,__CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY,__CTYPE_MULTIPART,__DOS_RCVD_MON,__DOS_RELAYED_EXT,
__FROM_ALL_NUMS,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_RCVD,__HAS_SUBJECT,__HAVE_BOUNCE_RELAYS,
__LAST_UNTRUSTED_RELAY_NO_AUTH,__MIME_VERSION,__MISSING_REF,__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,
__MSGID_OK_HEX,__NAKED_TO,__NO_REAL_NAME,__SANE_MSGID,__SARE_SPEC_SUBJ_LEO,
__SARE_WHITELIST_FLAG,__ST_ISMMS,__ST_ISMMS_SUBJECT,__TOCC_EXISTS
,__TVD_MIME_CT_MM
but nothing if:
X-Mms-Message-Type: 0
./sa-test.pl /tmp/RSbM-3pdTzIE.eml
__CT,__CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY,__CTYPE_MULTIPART,__DOS_RCVD_MON,__DOS_RELAYED_EXT
,__FROM_ALL_NUMS,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_RCVD,__HAS_SUBJECT,__HAVE_BOUNCE_RELAYS,
__LAST_UNTRUSTED_RELAY_NO_AUTH,__MIME_VERSION,__MISSING_REF,__MSGID_OK_DIGITS,
__MSGID_OK_HEX,__NAKED_TO,__NO_REAL_NAME,__SANE_MSGID,__SARE_SPEC_SUBJ_LEO,
__SARE_WHITELIST_FLAG,__ST_ISMMS_SUBJECT,__TOCC_EXISTS,__TVD_MIME_CT_MM
using this set of headers to test:
Received: from atlmtaow02.cingularme.com (atlmtaow02.cingularme.com
[66.102.165.7])
by mx1.comprehensive.cc.spammertrap.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
3EE131CC09C
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:16:49 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mms-MMS-Version: 18
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:25:45 -0500
X-Nokia-Ag-Internal: ; smiltype=true; internaldate=1251123945625
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_Part_5643167_20618687.1251123945631"
X-Mms-Delivery-Report: 0
Received: from schagw01 ([209.183.32.189]) by atlmtaow02.cingularme.com
(InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id
<20090824141645.ngjt6063.atlmtaow02.cingularme....@schagw01> for
<[email protected]>; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:16:45 -0400
X-Mms-Transaction-ID: MMS0000524776255
From: <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
X-Mms-Message-Class: 0
X-Mms-Read-Reply: 1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <21666699.1251123945632.javamail.wlu...@schagw01>
X-Mms-Priority: 1
X-Mms-Message-Type: 0
Subject: Multimedia message
X-Nokia-Ag-Version: 2.0
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
