https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6189
J.D. Falk <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from J.D. Falk <[email protected]> 2009-09-01 12:28:49 PST --- (In reply to comment #0) > Rats, I just noticed that in May 2009 a change from draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-09 > to -10 (and subsequently published as RFC 5617 in August 2009) changed > the definition of author signature (which was based on 'i' signature tag) > and renamed it to 'author domain signature', and made it based on a 'd' tag. Yes, that's correct. I apologize; I'd assumed that whoever was handling the DKIM plugin would be on the ietf-dkim mailing list. I'll make a point of alerting the SA community of any other changes, though I doubt there will be any. > In practice there shouldn't be much difference (e.g. in whitelisting), > as the 'i' tag (identity) is rarely a subdomain of a 'd' (signing domain) > - typically the domain in identity is exactly the same as the domain in > a 'd' tag (explicitly or by default). Yep, and there are very few ADSP records published thus far. Hopefully that'll change soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
