https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6200
Mark Martinec <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Target Milestone|Undefined |3.3.0 --- Comment #2 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2009-09-14 18:18:32 PDT --- > I wonder how this would effect spamassassin's perl version compatibility? > > Older distributions of perl didn't ship with Digest::SHA. I recently built > Digest::SHA for EPEL5 in order to support Mail::DKIM and it seems to be > working fine for DKIM at least. I didn't test it with RHEL-4 yet, which > has perl-5.8.5 and the oldest distribution that we possibly would care > for spamassassin. With versions of perl before the 5.10.0, one has to install one or the other module anyway, as it does not come with the perl package. I do not doubt that Digest::SHA installs and works just fine with 5.8.x, as this is not a new module. What I don't know is whether it is more difficult to install Digest::SHA compared to Digest::SHA1 on systems that you mention. On FreeBSD it is very straightforward. The Solaris CSW packages also have both modules available. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
