Joao Gouveia wrote: > (resending this, used a wrong email account ..) > > Hi, > > I was checking for FPs in our RBL, and noticed that most of them are > hitting on a ham corpus that doesn't look very hammy to me: > > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20091121-r882858-n/T_RCVD_IN_ANBREP_L3?mclog=ham-net-nbebout > > The scores are a bit strange (so are the rules being hit). Is this > really supposed to be ham? > > I have to admit, this does look like a spam corpus.
Of 77 messages 62 hit RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100. 49 hit URIBL_BLACK 45 hit T_URIBL_META_SURBL_ANY 26 hit RCVD_IN_XBL 25 hit various JM_SOUGHT rules. Given the broad diversity of fairly reliable spam indicators all matching heavily on this mail, this is either a spam corpus, or a corpus of email from "shady" companies that do lots of spamming, but the corpus maintainer actually subscribed to them.
