https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6247

--- Comment #13 from J.D. Falk <[email protected]> 2009-12-04 15:24:17 UTC 
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Furthermore, I've never been comfortable with such high artificial negative
> scores like -4 through -8 for any whitelist.  I think we should be more
> conservative and halve such numbers.

As long as you do the same to the other whitelists....

> Please explain how the old rules map to the new rules.

I'll ask a colleague to chime in.

Short version is that we've condensed all those old levels (quite some time
ago, actually), and now there are only the two: Certified, and Safe.  Both are
based on actual measurable results, rather than self-assertion of practices
like other whitelists.

-- 
Configure bugmail: 
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to