https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6241
--- Comment #3 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2009-12-16 04:46:15 UTC --- > yep, this is pretty serious brokenness. Actually, not only that it does not understand a nested if. I tried replacing nested 'if's with four independent ifs ( rulesrc/sandbox/khopesh/20_khop_bl.cf ) : if plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF) && plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM) meta __NOT_SPOOFED ALL_TRUSTED || SPF_PASS || DKIM_VALID endif if plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF) && !plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM) meta __NOT_SPOOFED ALL_TRUSTED || SPF_PASS endif if !plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF) && plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM) meta __NOT_SPOOFED ALL_TRUSTED || DKIM_VALID endif if !plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF) && !plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM) # Neither DKIM nor SPF ... ugh. meta __NOT_SPOOFED ALL_TRUSTED endif tflags __NOT_SPOOFED nice and the: perl build/mkrules --exit_on_no_src --src rulesrc --out rules \ --manifest MANIFEST --manifestskip MANIFEST.SKIP produced the following single 'if' in rules/72_active.cf: if plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::SPF) && plugin(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM) meta __NOT_SPOOFED ALL_TRUSTED || SPF_PASS || DKIM_VALID meta __NOT_SPOOFED ALL_TRUSTED || SPF_PASS meta __NOT_SPOOFED ALL_TRUSTED || DKIM_VALID meta __NOT_SPOOFED ALL_TRUSTED tflags __NOT_SPOOFED nice endif -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
