https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6247
John Hardin <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #56 from John Hardin <[email protected]> 2009-12-21 07:40:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #55) > > when looked at this way, they look more practical. a reliable way to cut the > FP rate by 17% is definitely useful, although obviously it'd be nice if the > 6.7% additional FNs was reduced. Perhaps the suggested metas with the DNSBLs might help with that. http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?rule=%2F[N_]_RP_ Unfortunately the last network masscheck seems to have only used one corpus so the results aren't interesting yet; they certainly don't track the earlier quick analysis I did by pulling the overlaps from the masscheck results (before I wrote the rules). -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
