https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6268
--- Comment #7 from Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]> 2010-01-11 08:38:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > +1 > > I don't mind the proposed change die->dbg, although the original change > was not unintentional. As an admin I'd be worried if some application tries > to write into /root (but fails), or if what is supposed to be a directory > turns out to be a regular file or worse (pipe, special device) - and > would prefer to be boldly notified by the application about such a failure. +1 - Also, the dbg to die change being an API change that is affecting real-world applications using the API, the change should be considered carefully and if necessary documented in an incompatibilities section / Changes / Readme. I'm not opposed to the change but would recommend it delay the release of 3.3.0 to give API integrators a chance to prepare compatible releases. Amavis and MIMEDefang, for example, come to mind. FYI, DFS of MD has also given lazy consensus to the die to dbg change. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
