On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 17:07 +0000, [email protected] wrote:
> Quoting Karsten Bräckelmann <[email protected]>:
>
> > Please see bug 6155 comment 128.
> > https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6155#c128
> > Comments? Is this something we need to worry about? I do, rather scary
> > to me. :/
>
> If the rule KB_FAKED_THE_BAT looks for the X-Mailer header, you can
> always tell The Bat! not to place the X-Mailer header. I use the
> professional version of the email client on my personal email account
> and have it removed as there is a telco around here that flat out
> rejects messages that bare the X-Mailer header sending from The Bat!.
Ah, that widely spread mis-information The Bat! is a spam tool. Yes,
indeed, I've come across that too often, and The Bat! users probably are
used to such issues. Doesn't make it any better, does it? ;)
Since the problem and potential for FPs is known, I figured I'd better
bring it up again -- before angry users do, whose mail ends up in the
bit bucket due to SA.
Of course, having onet.pl not break the MUA supplied headers would be
best.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
