https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
--- Comment #40 from Jeff Chan <[email protected]> 2010-03-03 15:39:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #39) > (In reply to comment #37) > > Bitmask would be clearer than hex or decimal number. > > It *is* a bitmask. 32 bit integer, decimal representation. > > Hmm, this is Perl. It should accept a 0x hex number, too. > complete_dnsbl_lookup() doesn't though, unless $subtest has been converted to > /\d+/ behind the scenes at that point. An IP address octet style bitmask would be clearer. It would look more like an IP address or IP address netmask than a raw number does. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
