https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6362
--- Comment #1 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2010-03-03 16:29:07 UTC --- > I presume a netmask for the above would be 128.255.254.255 which looks much > more reasonable than decimal or hex notation. As I understand it, there needs to be some syntactic distinction between a mask and an exact match IP address in the last parameter of the uridnssub. Currently the distinction is quad-dot vs. integer. I agree this looks ugly - as a minimum the mask should be specifiable in hex. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
