https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6335
Mark Martinec <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #85 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2010-03-11 20:44:51 UTC --- Found a minor glitch in a test t/uribl_all_types.t, which shows up under perl 5.6.2 . $ perl t/uribl_all_types.t 1..3 # Running under perl version 5.006002 for freebsd # Current time local: Thu Mar 11 21:43:41 2010 # Current time GMT: Thu Mar 11 20:43:41 2010 # Using Test.pm version 1.24 /usr/local/bin/perl -T -w ../spamassassin.raw -C log/test_rules_copy --siteconfigpath log/localrules.tmp -p log/test_default.cf -t < data/spam/dnsbl.eml ok 1 Checking X_URIBL_DOMSONLY Not found: X_URIBL_DOMSONLY = X_URIBL_DOMSONLY [URIs: uribl-example-c.com] at t/uribl_all_types.t line 45. not ok 2 # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 717 Checking X_URIBL_IPSONLY ok 3 Output can be examined in: log/d.uribl_all_types/1 Under 5.6.2 the result is: pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 X_URIBL_IPSONLY X_URIBL_IPSONLY [URIs: 144.137.3.98] 5.0 TEST_INVALID_DATE Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822) 0.0 T_FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_2 T_FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_2 0.0 T_LAZY_LISTWASHING Lazy spammer, painfully obvious bogus addresses 1.0 X_URIBL_DOMSONLY X_URIBL_DOMSONLY [URIs: uribl-example-b.com] 0.0 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date 0.0 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL 5.0 TEST_NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS T_TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNSl network by a host with no rDNS: under 5.10.1 the result is: pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 X_URIBL_IPSONLY X_URIBL_IPSONLY [URIs: 144.137.3.98] 1.0 X_URIBL_DOMSONLY X_URIBL_DOMSONLY [URIs: uribl-example-c.com] 5.0 TEST_INVALID_DATE Invalid Date: header (not RFC 2822) 0.0 T_FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_2 T_FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_2 0.0 T_LAZY_LISTWASHING Lazy spammer, painfully obvious bogus addresses 0.0 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date 0.0 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL 5.0 TEST_NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL 1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 T_TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS T_TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS Apart from reordered results, the key difference is 'b' vs 'c' in: [URIs: uribl-example-b.com] vs.: [URIs: uribl-example-c.com] As there are both links in the sample message: me too: http://uribl-example-b.com/ me too: http://uribl-example-c.com/ either hit should do to fulfill the %patterns requirement. Don't know why a different one is chosen under 5.6.2, but is not incorrect, so the test should probably be able to cope with either. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
