https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6417
--- Comment #4 from John Wilcock <[email protected]> 2010-04-27 14:47:09 EDT --- I continue to find false hits (saved by other rules, so not false positives as such) from genuine microsoft mail, and also for example, a genuine paypal notification from a nameless msn user: From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sender: [email protected] This paypal FP would not have hit the proposed SPF version of the rule, since paypal has correct SPF records. Something needs to be done. At the very least, the proposed SPF version should be adopted with a score somewhat lower than the current 3.7 IMO. On the other hand, the only recent actual spam hit I've seen recently that hit the rule would not have hit the proposed SPF version of the rule either, as it was sent via a bulk mail service that has correct SPF records. Envelope-From: [email protected] Received: from mailflip55.edt02.net (mailflip55.edt02.net [82.138.77.250]) by xxxxxxx.yyy.zz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6939B334032 for <[email protected]>; Thu, 22 Apr 2010 05:31:43 +0200 (CEST) From: "Microsoft par deltamailing" <[email protected]> Are others still seeing many spam hits for this rule? If not, perhaps it should be dropped altogether? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
