https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6443
--- Comment #5 from Mark Martinec <[email protected]> 2010-06-01 19:29:21 EDT --- > As I just said, an X-Foo header rule actually matching an X-foo lower-case > header is not documented (not that I could find it) It is documented in RFC 5322 (ex RFC 2822), section 1.2.2. Header field names are case-insensitive. > and really is useful only > with headers we do not have control over. That is, even work with headers that > have been added by external relays and *might* be improperly lower-cased. > > The X-Relay-Countries header, however, is generated by us and guaranteed to be > upper-cased. No need being liberal about what to accept. I'd consider case-sensitivity on meta header field names an anomaly. I don't claim that it should necessarily be fixed, but doing so could avoid surprises. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
