https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6448
Matt Kettler <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #2 from Matt Kettler <[email protected]> 2010-06-10 23:19:19 EDT --- Personally, I think it is foolish for us to have redundant rules in the ruleset. Lack of a FP may change the urgency, but we're still wasting CPU time, which is a bug. I suspect the intent was for the FB rule to eventually replace the original. I say this because it is very obvious the FB rule is derived from some version of drugs.cf one. I propose merging to a single rule, with a little more anti-obfu added: /N[o0].{1,10}P(?:er|re)scr[i1]pt[i1][o0]n.{1,10}(?:n[e3][e3]d[e3]d|requ[1i]re|n[e3]c[e3]ssary)/i Testing required of course, but this should cover all cases of both rules. That said, with no FP, I would consider this low priority. If it is causing FPs then we probably need to get this one fixed quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.
